PR Campaigns – The blog

February 16, 2009

We are PR Practitioners, Not Ambulance Chasers

Filed under: 3's Company PR — lmdavis2 @ 7:58 pm
Tags: , , ,

Charlotte Risch made an interesting post  in last week’s Valley PR Blog, she claimed that PR practitioners may be the new “ambulance chasers” replacing lawyers, who were previously attached to nickname. The derogatory term, in short, is defined by TIME magazine as a lawyer who persuades an injured person to hire them to sue for personal damages.

Risch made this comparison to ambulance chasers after Nadya Suleman, who gave bith to octoplets in early February after already having six previous children, hired a publicist instead of a nanny. I understand why Risch made this comparison, Suleman should be more focused on her 14 children rather than her relationship with the media. However, Suleman became an overnight sensation in the media.

At first it was positive attention but the headlines started turning against her when the truth behind her controversial pregnancy was revealed. The situation changed from a sensation to a crisis and who better to handle that than a publicist that specializes in crisis management. An ethical PR practitioner should serve as a mediator between Suleman and the media  and advise her on actions she could take to improve her reputation in the public’s eye.  However, if a PR practitioner acts unethically by drawing more attention to the client by making her out to be a “victim,” that would be the “ambulance chaser” that Risch is referring to.

In response to Risch’s frustration with people asking what PR is and questioning its involvement in cases like Suleman, I think we should take this as an opportunity to explain to people what crisis management is. If we explain that when crisis management is done properly and ethically it can be benefical to all parties involved and something good can come out a bad situation.

I understand the resoning behind Risch’s analogy, but we should be hesitant to associate the PR profession to more derrogatory terms than it already is. As long as practioners stick to the ethics the profession is based on (PRSA Ethics), critics will have fewer opportunities to attach it to derogatory terms.

Advertisements

2 Comments »

  1. Very interesting post and I completly agree. There is always going to be someone out there that does not stick to the code of ethics in any profession. However, I think more than anything deragatory terms such as this one are given to PR professionals because one does not fully understand the basis of PR.
    People create stereotypes based on what they hear in ONE particular situation not stopping to look at the profession as a whole.
    As we are learning PR goes much further than managing crisis; we as professionals deal with the whole package, The Image. Good or bad when it comes to publicity we must be the mediator, as you stated, and protect the image and reputation not create a new one.

    Comment by kristenih — February 16, 2009 @ 10:12 pm | Reply

  2. This is a fascinating post topic: kudos! I’m not sure that there’s much we can do to prevent others from attaching derogatory labels to us, except to behave in the most straightforward and ethical manner possible. (Also, proofread your post: you spell “practitioner” incorrectly more than once.)

    Comment by drgilpin — February 16, 2009 @ 10:56 pm | Reply


RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Create a free website or blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: